{
  "article": "dois-nomes-para-os-mesmos-palcos",
  "title": "Dois nomes para os mesmos palcos",
  "formula": "join/v1",
  "entity_types": [
    "Article",
    "Claim",
    "Discrepancy",
    "Event",
    "Source"
  ],
  "deliveries": [
    {
      "audience": "translation-en",
      "audience_name": "The faithful translation",
      "verdict": "reached",
      "rank": null,
      "control": true,
      "connections": [],
      "because": "The control audience. Every article reaches it and no selection runs — it is the baseline the other audiences' output is compared against."
    },
    {
      "audience": "startups",
      "audience_name": "The founder",
      "verdict": "reached",
      "rank": 5,
      "rank_note": "each entity counted once, at its strongest match",
      "connections": [
        {
          "entity": "event:startup-summit-lisbon-2026",
          "entity_label": "Startup Summit Lisbon 2026",
          "entity_type": "Event",
          "concern": "event",
          "concern_label": "Events worth attending",
          "match": "exact",
          "weight": 3,
          "reads": "The founder watches events worth attending; the article names Startup Summit Lisbon 2026, which is a Event.",
          "reads_inverse": "Startup Summit Lisbon 2026 satisfies events worth attending, which the founder watches."
        },
        {
          "audience": "startups",
          "concern": "event",
          "concern_label": "Events worth attending",
          "entity": "discrepancy:stage-names",
          "entity_label": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site",
          "entity_type": "Discrepancy",
          "path": "discrepancy:stage-names --involves--> source:agenda --describes--> event:startup-summit-lisbon-2026",
          "reads": "The founder watches events worth attending; the stage they were told to expect may not be the stage that exists, which matters to anyone printing a schedule, briefing a speaker or buying a sponsorship.",
          "reads_inverse": "This event's stage naming is unreliable, which the founder attending it needs to know.",
          "proposed_by": "model (illustrative — written by hand for this worked example, not produced by a running pipeline)",
          "match": "consequence",
          "weight": 2
        }
      ],
      "tried": [
        {
          "concern": "funding-programme",
          "label": "Funding programmes and calls",
          "wanted": [
            "Programme",
            "Instrument"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Programme or Instrument in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "event",
          "label": "Events worth attending",
          "wanted": [
            "Event"
          ],
          "hits": 1,
          "why_not": null
        },
        {
          "concern": "peer-company",
          "label": "Companies in the same sector",
          "wanted": [
            "Organisation"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Organisation in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "small-company-rule",
          "label": "Obligations that bind small companies",
          "wanted": [
            "Obligation"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Obligation in it"
        }
      ],
      "because": "2 connection(s) from 1 concern(s)."
    },
    {
      "audience": "investors",
      "audience_name": "The allocator",
      "verdict": "withheld",
      "rank": 0,
      "rank_note": "each entity counted once, at its strongest match",
      "connections": [],
      "tried": [
        {
          "concern": "sector-signal",
          "label": "Signals about a sector",
          "wanted": [
            "Sector",
            "Organisation"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Sector or Organisation in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "policy-direction",
          "label": "Policy and regulatory direction",
          "wanted": [
            "Instrument"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Instrument in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "population-count",
          "label": "Counts of a population and how they move",
          "wanted": [
            "Measure"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Measure in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "capital-flow",
          "label": "Money entering or leaving",
          "wanted": [
            "Money"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Money in it"
        }
      ],
      "because": "None of the concerns this audience watches were satisfied: this article has no Sector or Organisation in it; this article has no Instrument in it; this article has no Measure in it; this article has no Money in it."
    },
    {
      "audience": "c-level",
      "audience_name": "The executive",
      "verdict": "reached",
      "rank": 3,
      "rank_note": "each entity counted once, at its strongest match",
      "connections": [
        {
          "entity": "discrepancy:stage-names",
          "entity_label": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site",
          "entity_type": "Discrepancy",
          "concern": "board-question",
          "concern_label": "What a board will ask about",
          "match": "exact",
          "weight": 3,
          "reads": "The executive watches what a board will ask about; the article names the stage names disagree across three pages of one site, which is a Discrepancy.",
          "reads_inverse": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site satisfies what a board will ask about, which the executive watches."
        },
        {
          "entity": "discrepancy:stage-names",
          "entity_label": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site",
          "entity_type": "Discrepancy",
          "concern": "reputation",
          "concern_label": "Anything that becomes a public question",
          "match": "exact",
          "weight": 3,
          "reads": "The executive watches anything that becomes a public question; the article names the stage names disagree across three pages of one site, which is a Discrepancy.",
          "reads_inverse": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site satisfies anything that becomes a public question, which the executive watches."
        }
      ],
      "tried": [
        {
          "concern": "financial-consequence",
          "label": "Cost, revenue and exposure in money",
          "wanted": [
            "Money"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Money in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "board-question",
          "label": "What a board will ask about",
          "wanted": [
            "Discrepancy",
            "Obligation"
          ],
          "hits": 1,
          "why_not": null
        },
        {
          "concern": "competitive-position",
          "label": "Where we stand against named others",
          "wanted": [
            "Organisation"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Organisation in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "reputation",
          "label": "Anything that becomes a public question",
          "wanted": [
            "Discrepancy"
          ],
          "hits": 1,
          "why_not": null
        }
      ],
      "because": "2 connection(s) from 2 concern(s)."
    },
    {
      "audience": "cybersecurity",
      "audience_name": "The practitioner",
      "verdict": "withheld",
      "rank": 0,
      "rank_note": "each entity counted once, at its strongest match",
      "connections": [],
      "tried": [
        {
          "concern": "technology",
          "label": "Named technologies and versions",
          "wanted": [
            "Technology"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Technology in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "weakness",
          "label": "Weaknesses and how they are reached",
          "wanted": [
            "Weakness"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Weakness in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "control-action",
          "label": "Something to change on a system",
          "wanted": [
            "Control"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Control in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "integrity",
          "label": "Whether published information can be trusted",
          "wanted": [
            "Discrepancy"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "qualified_out": true,
          "why_not": "this concern only applies where the article is also about Technology or Weakness or Control, and this one is not"
        }
      ],
      "because": "None of the concerns this audience watches were satisfied: this article has no Technology in it; this article has no Weakness in it; this article has no Control in it; this concern only applies where the article is also about Technology or Weakness or Control, and this one is not."
    },
    {
      "audience": "risk",
      "audience_name": "The risk owner",
      "verdict": "reached",
      "rank": 3,
      "rank_note": "each entity counted once, at its strongest match",
      "connections": [
        {
          "entity": "discrepancy:stage-names",
          "entity_label": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site",
          "entity_type": "Discrepancy",
          "concern": "source-conflict",
          "concern_label": "Published information that disagrees with itself",
          "match": "exact",
          "weight": 3,
          "reads": "The risk owner watches published information that disagrees with itself; the article names the stage names disagree across three pages of one site, which is a Discrepancy.",
          "reads_inverse": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site satisfies published information that disagrees with itself, which the risk owner watches."
        },
        {
          "audience": "risk",
          "concern": "accountability",
          "concern_label": "Who is answerable",
          "entity": "discrepancy:stage-names",
          "entity_label": "the stage names disagree across three pages of one site",
          "entity_type": "Discrepancy",
          "path": "discrepancy:stage-names --involves--> source:patrocinadores; source:patrocinadores is a page of the event organiser's own site",
          "reads": "The risk owner watches who is answerable; one organisation published two answers to the same question on its own site, which is a control failure regardless of which answer is right.",
          "reads_inverse": "This discrepancy makes the event organiser answerable, which the risk owner watches.",
          "proposed_by": "model (illustrative — written by hand for this worked example, not produced by a running pipeline)",
          "match": "consequence",
          "weight": 2
        }
      ],
      "tried": [
        {
          "concern": "exposure-change",
          "label": "Something more likely or more expensive",
          "wanted": [
            "Weakness"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Weakness in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "obligation",
          "label": "Duties, and who they bind",
          "wanted": [
            "Obligation",
            "Instrument"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Obligation or Instrument in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "accountability",
          "label": "Who is answerable",
          "wanted": [
            "Organisation",
            "Person"
          ],
          "hits": 0,
          "why_not": "this article has no Organisation or Person in it"
        },
        {
          "concern": "source-conflict",
          "label": "Published information that disagrees with itself",
          "wanted": [
            "Discrepancy"
          ],
          "hits": 1,
          "why_not": null
        }
      ],
      "because": "2 connection(s) from 2 concern(s)."
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "reached": [
      "translation-en",
      "startups",
      "c-level",
      "risk"
    ],
    "withheld": [
      "investors",
      "cybersecurity"
    ]
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "kind": "ranking-observation",
      "audience": "startups",
      "concern": null,
      "note": "Ranked highest (5) for this article. Worth a human glance: a rank that surprises you is either a real finding or a concern that is too broad, and only reading the connections tells you which."
    }
  ]
}